ログイン
Language:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 100. 学内刊行物 (紀要、研究報告)
  2. 101-3. 奈良教育大学紀要 (人文・社会科学, 自然科学)
  3. 第45巻 第1号 人文・社会科学 (1996)

児童の文記憶における順向干渉に及ぼすトピック類似性の効果

http://hdl.handle.net/10105/1594
http://hdl.handle.net/10105/1594
b30e903d-b5cd-436d-b774-3d643d6c56a0
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
NUE45_1_151-163.pdf NUE45_1_151-163.pdf (607.9 kB)
アイテムタイプ 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2010-06-08
タイトル
タイトル 児童の文記憶における順向干渉に及ぼすトピック類似性の効果
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
著者 藤田, 正

× 藤田, 正

藤田, 正

Search repository
著者(ヨミ)
姓名 フジタ, タダシ
著者別名
姓名 FUJITA, Tadashi
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the effect of topic similarity on proactive interference (PI) in sentence recall using the Brown-Peterson paradigm with elementary school children. A 3 × 3 factorial design was used, which incorporated list conditions (same topic, related topic, and unrelated topic condition) and number of trials (from 1 to 3). The subjects were 90 6th grade children with a mean age of ll years and 8 months and were assigned to one of the three list conditions (see Table 1 ). Each list was consisted of three short sentences. Each sentence had 11 or 12 words and the first word (subject) was the topic word of each sentence. Under the same topic condition, all the lists in three trials consisted of sentences with the same topic (e.g. sea). Under the related topic condition, lists in three trials were consisted of sentences with related topics (e.g. sea, lake, river). Under the unrelated topic condition, lists in three trials consisted of sentences with unrelated, different topics (e.g.sea, heat, language). The experiment was conducted by a group administered procedure of Brown-Peterson paradigm. The booklet for experiment task contained instruction, three sentences to be remembered, distractor task and recall test sheets. Three sentences were presented simultaneously at 10 sec. rate, which was followed by the distractor task (counting backwards by-three from a 2 digit number: 20 sec). Then recall test by writing was given for 45 sec. The main results were as follows (see Fig. 1): on the performance of trial 1 to 3 under the same topic condition and the unrelated conditions, PI was built up as a function of trials. But PI was not built as a function of trials under the related topic condition. These results suggest that the buildup of PI was influenced with the similarity of topic in each sentence among adjacent trials. Since these results were partly different from the results of Dempster (1985) with university students, we could not simply interpret by the response set interference hypothesis. Instead of simple response set interfernce hypothesis, we interpreted these results by means of the revised list differenation hypotheses which were emphasized on the similarity among elements activated by topic words in each sentence at encoding and retrieval phases.
書誌情報 奈良教育大学紀要. 人文・社会科学

巻 45, 号 1, p. 151-163, 発行日 1996-11-25
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 05472393
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00181081
著者版フラグ
出版タイプ VoR
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル The Effect of Topic Similarity on Proactive Interference in Sentence Recall with Children
出版者
出版者 奈良教育大学
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 10:22:43.871517
Show All versions

Share

Share
tweet

Cite as

Other

print

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX
  • ZIP

コミュニティ

確認

確認

確認


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3