@article{oai:nara-edu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00013184,
 author = {豊田, 弘司 and 井上, 拓哉},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {奈良教育大学紀要. 人文・社会科学},
 month = {Nov},
 note = {Three experiments were carried out to examine the relationships between the size of spacing effects (difference of recall performance　between the spaced and the massed presentation) and types　of processing in incidental memory. In both experiments, participants were presented with target　words on two occasions, and were asked each time to answer the questions corresponding to each type　of processing, followed by free recall tests. In Experiment I, participants were presented with target　words by power-point slide projector and were asked to answer the question corresponding to survival　processing or pleasantness processing conditions by 6-point rating scale, followed by incidental free recall test. The size of the spacing effect in survival processing was larger than that in pleasantness processing. However, the list of target words were not completely counterbalanced. In Experiment II the list target words were completely counterbalanced and were presented by booklet. The difference of the size of the spacing effect between both types of processing was not observed. But for the target words rated as congruous, the recall performance between the massed and the spaced presentation was not observed in the survival processing, but the spaced presentation led to better recall than the massed presentation in pleasantness processing. And the survival processing led to better recall than the pleasantness processing. In Experiment III, the effect of the survival processing was compared to that of the self-reference processing. There were no difference of recall performance and the size of the spacing effects between both types of processing. The result was interpreted as showing that the survival and the self-reference processing had the same effects on the spacing effect in incidental memory. These results of the three experiments were interpreted as showing that the survival processing as well as the self-reference processing were powerful encoding in incidental memory.},
 pages = {39--48},
 title = {偶発記憶における分散効果と処理型の関係},
 volume = {67},
 year = {2018}
}