ログイン
Language:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 100. 学内刊行物 (紀要、研究報告)
  2. 101-3. 奈良教育大学紀要 (人文・社会科学, 自然科学)
  3. 第72巻 第1号人文・社会科学(2023)

ハンドボールにおける審判員の判定に関する研究─操作的判定に着目して─

https://doi.org/10.20636/0002000062
https://doi.org/10.20636/0002000062
1dee630c-bed0-4fed-8cba-a478d5217fa5
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
NUE72_1_53-64.pdf NUE72_1_53-64.pdf (516 KB)
アイテムタイプ 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2024-02-05
タイトル
タイトル ハンドボールにおける審判員の判定に関する研究─操作的判定に着目して─
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル A Study on Judging by Referees in Handball:Focusing on Manipulative Judgment
言語 en
言語
言語 jpn
キーワード
主題 ハンドボール, 審判員, 誤審, 操作的判定
handball, referee, misjudgment, manipulative.judgment
資源タイプ
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.20636/0002000062
ID登録タイプ JaLC
著者 西城,黎一

× 西城,黎一

ja 西城,黎一

Search repository
高橋,豪仁

× 高橋,豪仁

ja 高橋,豪仁

Search repository
著者(ヨミ)
姓名 サイジョウ,レイイチ
言語 ja
姓名 タカハシ,ヒデサト
言語 ja
著者別名
姓名 SAIJO, Reiichi
言語 en
姓名 TAKAHASHI, Hidesato
言語 en
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 The purpose of this study is to clarify "the existence of intentional misjudgment" and "the actual situation of manipulative judgment and the situations in which they can occur" in handball competition by conducting an interview survey and a questionnaire survey of referees certified by the Japan Handball Association. In this
study, "intentional misjudgment" was defined as a judgment caused by the referee who doesn’t intentionally take a foul even though the referee recognizes the foul. “Manipulative judgement” has two types: type A is a judgment that the referee does not intentionally take a foul even though he / she admits the foul act, or a judgment that the referee lightens the penalties for the foul act; type B is a judgement that the referee intentionally calls a foul despite the fact that he / she admits no foul, or the referee increases the penalty for the foul.
In order to clarify the existence of intentional misjudgment, an interview survey was conducted with three persons who have A-class or B-class referee qualifications officially recognized by the association. In order to clarify the occurrence of manipulative judgement, a questionnaire survey was conducted on 66 people who had
he A, B, C, or D grades of the referee qualifications.
The following findings were obtained:
(1)There are "intended misjudgments" in handball games, and they are used for the purpose of invalidating and reducing the weight of penalties. (2) Manipulative judgment (type A) was confirmed by nearly 70% of the subjects, and they adjusted the adaptation of the rules depending on the situation. It was suggested that the
background of such judgment is the idea of "modern handball" that has been advocated in recent years. (3)Manipulative judgment (type B) was confirmed by about 20% of the subjects, suggesting that they are intended to prevent serious accidents and injury to players during the game.
言語 en
書誌情報 ja : 奈良教育大学紀要. 人文・社会科学
en : Bulletin of Nara University of Education. Cultural and Social Science

巻 72, 号 1, p. 53-64, 発行日 2023-11-30
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 05472393
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00181081
著者版フラグ
出版タイプ VoR
出版者
出版者 奈良教育大学
言語 ja
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2024-01-31 05:40:51.596724
Show All versions

Share

Share
tweet

Cite as

Other

print

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX
  • ZIP

コミュニティ

確認

確認

確認


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3