ログイン
Language:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 100. 学内刊行物 (紀要、研究報告)
  2. 101-3. 奈良教育大学紀要 (人文・社会科学, 自然科学)
  3. 第30巻 第2号 自然科学 (1981)

Some Remarks on High Order Derivations Ⅱ <Dedicated to Professor Yoshikazu Nakai on his 60th birthday>

http://hdl.handle.net/10105/2346
http://hdl.handle.net/10105/2346
74da9cc2-c546-405f-9388-b4980adba410
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
NUE30_2_1-7.pdf NUE30_2_1-7.pdf (234.0 kB)
アイテムタイプ 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2010-02-05
タイトル
タイトル Some Remarks on High Order Derivations Ⅱ <Dedicated to Professor Yoshikazu Nakai on his 60th birthday>
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
著者 KIKUCHI, Teppei

× KIKUCHI, Teppei

KIKUCHI, Teppei

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Let A be a commutative ring with 1 and k be a subfield of A. In the previous papers [2] and [3], Y. Nakai and the author showed that the following three statements are equivalent, provided that A is a field. (1゜) D(A/k)=Homk(A, A), where D(A/k) denotes the derivation algebra of A over k. (2゜) A is purely inseparable over k and [A : k]<∞. (3゜) IA=Ker(A?kA→A) is a nilpotent ideal of A?kA. Subsequently Y. Nakai proved that the statement (1゜) is equivalent in general (i.e. without assumption that A is a field) to the next statement ([4]). (2゜)′ A is a quasi-local ring with the maximal ideal m such that m is nilpotentand the residue field A/m is a purely inseparable and finite extension over k. Moreover his proof had an effect on making it clear that even (1゜) and (3゜) are equivalent in general, although it was not stated explicitly. However it seems to me that not a little part of his proof of (1゜)⇒(2゜)′ is based on our previous theorem. In this paper we shall try to give a simpler proof not making use of our previous theorem, as much as possible, except in the last stage. And we shall give a straightforward proof of the equivalence of (1゜) and (3゜) in general setting. The idea of the proofs of Prop. 5 and Lemma 6 is due to Nakai [4] and [5].
書誌情報 奈良教育大学紀要. 自然科学

巻 30, 号 2, p. 1-7, 発行日 1981-11-25
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 05472407
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00181070
著者版フラグ
出版タイプ VoR
出版者
出版者 奈良教育大学
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 11:35:21.251175
Show All versions

Share

Share
tweet

Cite as

Other

print

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX
  • ZIP

コミュニティ

確認

確認

確認


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3