WEKO3
アイテム
分散分析における誤差項に関する一考察
http://hdl.handle.net/10105/2826
http://hdl.handle.net/10105/2826a92a7dc2-44d8-43c5-8124-8e8c346a8bc8
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
NUE21_1_237-241.pdf (184.3 kB)
|
|
| アイテムタイプ | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2010-03-23 | |||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||
| タイトル | 分散分析における誤差項に関する一考察 | |||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||
| 著者 |
瀧野, 千春
× 瀧野, 千春
|
|||||||
| 著者(ヨミ) | ||||||||
| 姓名 | タキノ, チハル | |||||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||||
| 姓名 | Takino, Chiharu | |||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||
| 内容記述 | In the analysis of variance technique, the author has considered the two-factor experimental design with repeated measures on one factor. Having, decided, for example, that the repeated factor is Factor B, and the non-repeated factor is Factor A, there are four cases depending upon the fact that Factor A and Factor B are fixed factor or random factor. It is as follows: Case 1: Factor A and Factor B are both fixed. Case 2: Factor A is fixed, and Factor B random. Case 3: Factor A is random, and Factor B fixed. Case 4: Factor A and Factor B are both random. As for the Case 1, the error(b) term is used as denominator for F ratio to test the significance of main effect of Factor A', and the error (w) term is used to test the Factor B and to test the interaction effect of A and B. As for the Case 2, the error(w) term is used for the same purpose as previously described in the Case 1. But, to test the significance of Factor A, the quasi-F ratio is used instead of the usual F ratio. The denominator of the quasi-F ratio is the quantity which has been expressed by the equation MSab + MSerror(b) - MSerror (w). As for the Case 3, the mean square for AB interaction term is used to test the significance of Factor B; and the error(b) term and the error(w) term are used in the same way as in the Case 1. As for the Case 4, the quasi-F ratio is used to test the significance of Factor A; and to test the significance of Factor B and AB interaction, the techniques previously described in the Case 3 are applied. | |||||||
| 書誌情報 |
奈良教育大学紀要. 人文・社会科学 巻 21, 号 1, p. 237-241, 発行日 1972-11-15 |
|||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 05472393 | |||||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00181081 | |||||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||||
| その他のタイトル | AN APPROPRIATE USE OF ERROR TERM IN THE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE | |||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||
| 出版者 | 奈良教育大学 | |||||||
