ログイン
Language:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 100. 学内刊行物 (紀要、研究報告)
  2. 101-3. 奈良教育大学紀要 (人文・社会科学, 自然科学)
  3. 第16巻 第1号 人文・社会科学 (1968)

言語条件づけと強化の型, 不安およびGSRの関係

http://hdl.handle.net/10105/3284
http://hdl.handle.net/10105/3284
050ddca1-e136-42aa-a20b-dc176172bda0
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
NUE16_1_205-221.pdf NUE16_1_205-221.pdf (1.0 MB)
アイテムタイプ 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2010-05-11
タイトル
タイトル 言語条件づけと強化の型, 不安およびGSRの関係
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
著者 玉瀬, 耕治

× 玉瀬, 耕治

玉瀬, 耕治

Search repository
著者(ヨミ)
姓名 タマセ, コウジ
著者別名
姓名 Tamase, Koji
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 This investigation examined the effects of type of reinforcement and anxiety level on vevbal conbitioning(VC). The Cattell Anxiety Scale revised in Japan was conducted to 237 undergraduate students to evaluate their anxiety level. From the highest end and the lowest end of the CAS score distribution, 60 Ss were ranbomly assigned to one of the three experimental conditions, with 10 Ss in each cell. The Taffel type procedure was used. The Ss were tested individually with 60 white index cards, each contained a three-syllable present tense verb selected from Kashu's "T" association list (1962) and the four pronouns: I, YOU, HE, and SHE. Each card was presented at the S's own rate after 10 sec. interval of his response to the preceding card. The first 15 trials were not reinforced in order to establish each S's operant level. For the following 30 trials, E said "Good" in a flat manner (Gr. 1), or "Mm-hmm" accompanying head nod (Gr. 2), whenever an S made a sentence with HE or SHE. The last 15 trials were not reinforced to assess the extinction effect. During the 60 trials the control group (Gr. 3) was not reinforced at all. GSR was recorded throughout the experimental session to see the S's physiological states. After the last trial all 5s were administered the awareness questionnaire. The following results were obtained: (1) "Good" was likely to be effective as a reinforcer for low-anxiety Ss, and "Mm-hmm" plus nodding seemed to be effective for high-anxiety Ss, but the reinforcement effects were slight as a whole (Table 3); (2) GSR deflections seemed to be greater for low-anxiety Ss than for high-anxiety Ss in Gr. 2, but no such differences were found in Gr. 1 and Gr. 3 (Table 5); (3) "Mm-hmm" plus nodding appeared to influence GSR deflections compaired with "Good"(Table 6); (4) When the data were dichotomized by orienting reflex (OR), measured by GSR deflections for the first reinforcement stimulus, high-OR groups tended to be more easily conditioned than low-OR groups, though statistical level of confidence was not obtained (Table 7); (5) The frequencies of the four pronouns were significantly different from each other in the operant level (Table 11); (6) Reanalysis of the data revealed that the Ss who showed high-preference for HE and SHE indicated no increasing trends through reinforcemet, but that the Ss who showed low-preference for HE and SHE were fairly condotioned through reinforcement (Table 12). Discussion was made on several possible bases of the finding that the verbal conditioning was not established sufficiently as a whole. The reinforcement by anxiety interaction, relationship between awareness and VC, and relationship between S's preference and VC were also discussed.
書誌情報 奈良教育大学紀要. 人文・社会科学

巻 16, 号 1, p. 205-221, 発行日 1968-02-29
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 05472393
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00181081
著者版フラグ
出版タイプ VoR
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル INTERRELATIONSHIPS AMONG TYPE OF REINFORCEMENT, ANXIETY, GSR, AND VERBAL CONDITIONING
出版者
出版者 奈良教育大学
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 11:26:16.095533
Show All versions

Share

Share
tweet

Cite as

Other

print

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX
  • ZIP

コミュニティ

確認

確認

確認


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3