WEKO3
アイテム
天皇機関説について
http://hdl.handle.net/10105/4831
http://hdl.handle.net/10105/4831eda2a567-4e6e-44e8-8551-a95a7e5de65e
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
NUE9_1_105-118.pdf (1.1 MB)
|
|
| アイテムタイプ | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2010-12-20 | |||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||
| タイトル | 天皇機関説について | |||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||
| 著者 |
今井, 直重
× 今井, 直重
|
|||||||
| 著者(ヨミ) | ||||||||
| 姓名 | イマイ, ナオシゲ | |||||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||||
| 姓名 | IMAI, NAOSHIGE | |||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||
| 内容記述 | Dr. Minobe interpreted concerning the Emperor's status in the previous constitution that the Emperor is the highest organ of the state of Japan. This interpretition is the most authoritative theory on the Emperor's status in the Meiji constitution. This doctrine derives from the theory of juridical person of the state as its premise. That is, the state is a perfect juridical person independently of and transcending the component people. It has its own will, intention , ability, activity and personality (especially international personality) It is a sovereign community. The sovereignty (maijestas in realis) resides with the state itself. But the Emperor has actual sovereignty (sovereign powar, maijestas in persona) The will of the Emperor constitutes the will of the states. In this case Dr. Minobe calls the Emperor the highest organ of the state. However, I call such status of the Emperor in the former constitution 'der Trager der Staatsgewalt' as Rehm states. For the organ of the state is not the 'Zurechnungsendepunkt' of the state , but 'Durchgangspunkt' of the responsibility of the state. Der Trager der Staatsgewalt is the 'Zurechnungsendepuikt' of the state as Hans Kelsen prescribes. So the people in the present constitution is not the highest organ of the state. It is rightly said to be the carrier of the state sovereign power. According to my opinion the highest organ of the state is distinctly distinguished from the carrier of the state sovereign power. The carrier of the state power is superior to the highest organ of the state power. In the previous constitution, the Emperor's status in the first article is the carrier of the state power and that in the fourth article the highest organ of the state power. But in general the Emperor's status in the first article and that in the fourth article in the previous constitution are not distinguished, and they are equally said to be the highest organ of the state. I cannot accept such interpretation. I put stress in my opinion on this very point, and want to make it clear in this treatise. | |||||||
| 書誌情報 |
奈良学芸大学紀要 巻 9, 号 1, p. 105-118, 発行日 1960-02-15 |
|||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0369321X | |||||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00180996 | |||||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||||
| その他のタイトル | Treatise on the Theory of the Emperors' Status as the Highest Organ of the State in the Previous Constitution by Dr. Minobe. | |||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||
| 出版者 | 奈良学芸大学 | |||||||
