ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 100. 学内刊行物 (紀要、研究報告)
  2. 101-3. 奈良教育大学紀要 (人文・社会科学, 自然科学)
  3. 第65巻 第1号 人文・社会科学 (2016)

上原專祿「死者・生者」論における「主体性」発動の基盤と契機─「他者」としての「死者」からの「切迫」と「有責性」─

http://hdl.handle.net/10105/11029
http://hdl.handle.net/10105/11029
0f09441f-5a55-4c22-ab08-23d9bfc1c710
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
NUE65_1_1-19.pdf NUE65_1_1-19.pdf (708.6 kB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2017-01-23
タイトル
タイトル 上原專祿「死者・生者」論における「主体性」発動の基盤と契機─「他者」としての「死者」からの「切迫」と「有責性」─
言語 ja
言語
言語 jpn
キーワード
主題 主体性, subjectivity, 「死者」, “The Dead Person”, 有責性, responsibility, 上原專祿, UEHARA Senroku, ETYP:教育関連論文
資源タイプ
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
著者 片岡, 弘勝

× 片岡, 弘勝

片岡, 弘勝

Search repository
著者(ヨミ)
姓名 カタオカ, ヒロカツ
著者別名
姓名 Kataoka, Hirokatsu
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 The purpose of this article is to clarify the base and moment for generating “subjectivity” in UEHARA Senroku’s “The Dead Person and the living person” theroy, by focussing the “imminency” and “responsibility” for “The Dead Person”. This study analyzed UEHARA’s works texts and clarified the following five points.1. UEHARA proposed the idea of “subjectivity of the living person as media of The Dead Person”. This idea rinks to criticism to religion, that implies to find out the human abilities which have been preserved in the form of religion in histroy.2. In the case of being imminet by message of “The Dead Person” who was killed unjustly, “the living person” is stimulated and roaded to must to check and direct own’s living styles and standpoints of valuing. According to this UEHARA’s theory context, “subjectivity of the living person” is founded by listening the wording of “The Dead Person” intently and correctly.3. This study examined to compare UEHARA’s “subjectivity” theory with Emmanuel Lévinas’s “subjectivity” theory(discussed by UCHIDA Tatsuru). Then this study indicated the following two common factors and two different factors in both theories. One factor of the common factors is the idea that wording of “The Dead Person” directs “the living person”. The other factor is the strong intention for recognizing something”(“etwas”) that is cannot be described by present academic methods, namely “extremly complex realties” and “the dynamics and chaos of human mind”.4. One factor of the different factors is following point. Lévinas used wordings of “withdrawing one’s previous statesments”. However UEHARA used wordings of “checking and bounding one’s previous statesments relatively”. The other factor is following point. Lévinas supposed the “subjectivity” to responsibility for “The Dead Person” in relation to absolute “God”. However UEHARA supposed the “subjectivity” to responsibility for “The Dead Person” in relation to historical recognition to the oath of Shakyamuni and Nichiren in Buddhism thoughts.5. On this discussion context, the momnet of UEHARA’s “subjectivity” is “responsibility” for “The Dead Person” as absolute “The Other Being”. Further, the base of UEHARA’s “subjectivity” is the one’s recognition and standpoints for attaching importance to “reverence to human life” in severe situation that all persons are fronted the risk of being killed and becoming assistants of killers.
書誌情報 ja : 奈良教育大学紀要. 人文・社会科学

巻 65, 号 1, p. 1-19, 発行日 2016-11-30
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 05472393
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00181081
著者版フラグ
出版タイプ VoR
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル The Base and Moment for Generating “Subjectivity”in UEHARA Senroku’s “The Dead Person and the Living Person” Theroy : Focussing the “Imminency” and “Responsibility” for “The Dead Person”
出版者
出版者 奈良教育大学
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 10:48:32.440967
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3