ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 100. 学内刊行物 (紀要、研究報告)
  2. 101-3. 奈良教育大学紀要 (人文・社会科学, 自然科学)
  3. 第65巻 第1号 人文・社会科学 (2016)

Examining Japanese Teachers’ Use of L1 in English Classes :Frequency, Function and Reasons behind them

http://hdl.handle.net/10105/11041
http://hdl.handle.net/10105/11041
ecc7095a-e938-4e03-810d-2f6f592e930d
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
NUE65_1_125-139.pdf NUE65_1_125-139.pdf (322.6 kB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2017-01-24
タイトル
タイトル Examining Japanese Teachers’ Use of L1 in English Classes :Frequency, Function and Reasons behind them
言語 en
言語
言語 jpn
キーワード
主題 lesson analysis, L1 use, teacher belief, ETYP:教育関連論文
資源タイプ
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
著者 Izumitani, Tadashi

× Izumitani, Tadashi

Izumitani, Tadashi

Search repository
Sato, Rintaro

× Sato, Rintaro

Sato, Rintaro

Search repository
著者(ヨミ)
姓名 イズミタニ, タダシ
著者(ヨミ)
姓名 サトウ, リンタロウ
著者別名
姓名 泉谷, 忠至
著者別名
姓名 佐藤, 臨太郎
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Senior high school teachers are supposed to conduct English classes mainly in English, and, according to MEXT (2013), junior high school English classes will be also taught mainly in English. Although it is crucial that teachers provide more L2 (target language) input for students to acquire a target language, L1 (learners’ mother tongue) should not be excluded in lessons. In this study, we examined Japanese English teachers’ use of L1 (Japanese), focusing on frequency, function and reasons behind them. In the study, each lesson of one senior high school teacher and two junior high school teachers was recorded and transcribed to examine the frequency and functions of their L1 use. The percentage of the teachers’ L1 (Japanese) use was calculated referring to Kimi and Shawn (2014), and the functions of L1 use were categorized based on Campa and Nasaaji (2009). After the lessons,stimulated recall interviews and questionnaire surveys were conducted to examine the reasons of their L1 use in their recorded lessons. The result showed that there was a significant difference in the ratio of L2 use in lessons among the teachers whose language proficiency levels were almost the same, and that the most frequently used functions of L1 use in the three lessons are activity instruction, followed by explanation and translation. Examining the reasons of their L1-use frequency and functions, we found that their L1 use seemed to be influenced by internal factors (e.g., teachers’ belief towards L1 and L2 use) rather than external factors (e.g., lesson contents, class size). In addition, the study concluded that learners’ grade or L2 proficiency level does not seem to influence teachers’ L2 use in the classroom. Limitations are shown in the end.
書誌情報 ja : 奈良教育大学紀要. 人文・社会科学

巻 65, 号 1, p. 125-139, 発行日 2016-11-30
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 05472393
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00181081
著者版フラグ
出版タイプ VoR
出版者
出版者 奈良教育大学
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 10:48:18.328873
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3