WEKO3
アイテム
上原專祿「主体性形成」論における認識深化の方法論理 -固有の「リアリズム」を醸成する認識の動態性-
http://hdl.handle.net/10105/9034
http://hdl.handle.net/10105/903498ec23e5-affa-4237-a565-38338b55506c
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
NUE61_1_13-26.pdf (480.3 kB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2013-12-19 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 上原專祿「主体性形成」論における認識深化の方法論理 -固有の「リアリズム」を醸成する認識の動態性- | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 主体性形成 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 認識深化 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 認識の動態性 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 上原專祿 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | subject-formation | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | deepening learner's recognition | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | dynamic recognition | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | UEHARA Senroku | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
著者 |
片岡, 弘勝
× 片岡, 弘勝 |
|||||
著者(ヨミ) | ||||||
識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
識別子 | 49738 | |||||
姓名 | カタオカ, ヒロカツ | |||||
著者別名 | ||||||
識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
識別子 | 49739 | |||||
姓名 | KATAOKA, Hirokatsu | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | The purpose of this article is to clarify the methodology for deepening learner's recognition of UEHARA Senroku's theory on subject-formation focussing on the dynamic recognition oriented for brewing his own realism. The pivot of UEHARA's recognition method is "Shishin" (historical mind) that checks the European "modernity" and "rationality" relatively. This study proposed a schme about the structure of the European rational mind that was grasped by UEHARA. This schme is that the European rationality is made on the base of consent on the existence of something ("etwas" ) cannot be divided by the rationalism and the volition for vitalizing such something ("etwas" ). However UEHARA checked this European schme relatively. His "Shishin" mind attached importance to not only the chaos of the something ("etwas" ) that cannot be understood by the intellect at a single stroke, but also the chaos of the something ("etwas" ) that cannot be described by the present academic method, namely the infinite possibility of the human being. He imaged the brewing reality and actuality of recognition, that is from above mentioned chaos to the mature of recognition, through trial and error of works, labor, thinking, learning and so on. Moreover UEHARA proposed a strong dynamic "turn and return" between thoroughly investigating learner's own situation and thoroughly investigating the reality of the naure, society and history. He imaged that the learner can check unreliable factors of the religious emotion and conventional informations, and can make reliable wisdom and ability, through this strong dynamic "turn and return". Therefore this study proposed UEHARA's schme that recognition for Japanese subject-formation is made on the base of consent on the existence of above mentioned something ("etwas" ) and the volition for investigating and vitalizing such something ("etwas" ). | |||||
内容記述 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | 本研究は、日本学術振興会2010~2011年度科学研究費補助金を受けて行った研究(基盤研究(C)「主体的課題化学習における『個志向と集団志向の緊張力学』に関する理論的実証的研究」(2010~2012年度・課題番号22530860・研究代表者=片岡弘勝)の成果の一部である。 | |||||
書誌情報 |
奈良教育大学紀要. 人文・社会科学 巻 61, 号 1, p. 13-26, 発行日 2012-11-30 |
|||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 05472393 | |||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AN00181081 | |||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
その他のタイトル | ||||||
その他のタイトル | The Methodology for Deepening Learner's Recognition of UEHARA Senroku's Theory on Subject-formation : Focussing on the Dynamic Recognition Oriented for Brewing His Own Realism | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 奈良教育大学 |