WEKO3
アイテム
急進主義か，あるいは保守主義か？─『マリーノ・ファリエロ』の政治性をめぐって─
http://hdl.handle.net/10105/00013184
http://hdl.handle.net/10105/000131845a50b8c9-cc49-45b5-8c16-650b91fc4039
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
16_門田2_奈良教育大学紀要67-1 (514.9 kB)
|
|
| アイテムタイプ | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2019-01-31 | |||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||
| タイトル | 急進主義か，あるいは保守主義か？─『マリーノ・ファリエロ』の政治性をめぐって─ | |||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||
| タイトル | Is this play radical or conservative? : On the Politics of Marino Faliero | |||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題 | バイロン｜マリーノ・ファリエロ｜政治｜急進的｜保守的 Byron｜Marino Faliero｜politics｜radical｜conservative |
|||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||
| 著者 |
門田, 守
× 門田, 守
|
|||||||
| 著者(ヨミ) | ||||||||
| 姓名 | カドタ, マモル | |||||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||||
| 姓名 | KADOTA, Mamoru | |||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||
| 内容記述 | This essay on George Gordon Byron’s Marino Faliero examines whether this poetical drama should be regarded as politically radical or conservative. On the level of its textual presentation, this drama has a conservative outlook no matter how closely we look at it, or at least we must admit its weak-kneed nature in that Faliero’s attempt to bring about a revolution in Venetian politics is destined to result in failure. If we take into account its allusion to the post-Napoleonic political situation in Britain, however, the drama’s potential radicalism becomes apparent, as some contemporary reviews specify that the doge’s words can be as dangerous as Arthur Thistlewood and James Ings’s assertion rendered in blank verse. The ringleaders of the Cato Street Conspiracy, the reviews claim, have thesame kind of political dissatisfaction as Israel Bertuccio, the doge’s associate, bears in mind. The doge’s characterization, however, shows a considerable degree of fluctuation. His personality as a Byronic hero wavers between a radical champion of people’s rights and a conservative preserver of aristocratic vested interests. His execution at the Giant’s Staircase, therefore, allows a contradictory interpretation: he might have courageously died in battle, but at the same time he might have miserably committed suicide. The readers or the audience are entrusted with a task to decide which should be a convincing conclusion. As they think deeply over the issue, I wish to assert, they are induced to become acutely aware of the deplorable political situation which caused the dodge’s death. If the oppressive rule of the nobility in Venice can be figuratively associated with the inhuman treatment of the people in Britain, Marino Faliero might be regarded as Byron’s radical message. |
|||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 奈良教育大学紀要. 人文・社会科学 巻 67, 号 1, p. 171-178, 発行日 2018-11-30 |
|||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 05472393 | |||||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00181081 | |||||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||
| 出版者 | 奈良教育大学 | |||||||
